Fastest 200 ODI Guide – fastest 200 odi Records & Analysis

Last updated: September 5

Direct answer: The fastest double century in ODI cricket by balls faced belongs to Ishan Kishan — he got to 200 in 126 balls against Bangladesh at Chattogram, the quickest ODI 200 ever recorded. That remains the benchmark for “fastest 200 in ODI” by balls.

If you only need the top of the leaderboard, here are the current pace-setters for the quickest double hundreds in One-Day Internationals, measured strictly by balls to the 200 mark:

• Ishan Kishan — 200 in 126 balls (210, India vs Bangladesh, Chattogram)
• Glenn Maxwell — 200 in 128 balls (201*, Australia vs Afghanistan, Wankhede; the fastest 200 in an ODI World Cup and the only 200 in a chase)
• Chris Gayle — 200 in 138 balls (215, West Indies vs Zimbabwe, Manuka Oval)
• Virender Sehwag — 200 in 140 balls (219, India vs West Indies, Indore)
• Shubman Gill — 200 in 145 balls (208, India vs New Zealand, Hyderabad)

Everything below is the thorough, context-rich version you came for—what those numbers felt like live, what they meant strategically, which venues keep showing up, and how this record keeps evolving.

Why “Fastest 200 in ODI” Matters (And What We’re Measuring)

Double centuries in ODIs used to be fairy tales. A batter needed audacity, perfect surface, small margins, boundary-happy muscle memory, and a day when fielders became spectators. Now, the modern ODI game, reshaped by T20 skillsets, two-new-balls era, and aggressive batting philosophies, has stretched the ceiling. Yet even today, a double hundred demands orchestration: rapid yet controlled early scoring, a middle-overs surge against spin, relentless pressure on the fifth bowler, and a final-quarter avalanche of boundaries. That’s why “fastest ODI double century” by balls faced has become a clean, uncompromising way to compare masterpieces across eras and conditions.

For this page, “fastest” strictly means balls taken to reach the 200 milestone, not overall strike rate, not time spent, not last-over flourish. It’s the purest number in the chaos.

Top 10: Fastest 200 in ODI by Balls (Updated)

Note: Balls to 200 is the ordering metric. Runs, strike rate, and boundary counts refer to the completed innings. Where the match had a special context—World Cup, run chase, or record conditions—those are noted as well.

Important note on Sri Lanka’s landmark: Pathum Nissanka’s 210* at Pallekele is the island’s first ODI double century and one of the quickest in modern ODI batting by overall tempo. Precise balls-to-200 figures vary across some summaries, but his innings belongs in the conversation for the fastest 200 in ODI among recent knocks and certainly ranks among the cleanest by execution: compact hitting, minimal risk, sublime pacing.

Fastest ODI Double Century: The Innings That Redefined It

Ishan Kishan’s 200 in 126 balls is the reference point because it compresses the entire ODI scoring arc into a sprint. It wasn’t a calculated crawl then a late explosion; it was relentless from the first exchanges. What made it brutally effective:

• Intent in the powerplay: He hit the seamers on the up, showing minimal footwork and using bat speed and reach to carve square on both sides.
• Spin neutralization: He played deep in the crease against spin, especially the stock left-arm orthodox and off-spin, reducing the ball’s room to bite, and then ranged out for length balls. He wasn’t sweeping for survival; he was sweeping as a scoring weapon.
• Middle-overs destruction: ODI double hundreds die in the middle overs when singles become sticky and the boundary flow breaks. Kishan didn’t let the rate drop—his gear-change around the 30th over turned good into historic.
• Boundary placement: Against deep fields, he still pierced layers with flat angles behind point and midwicket, then lofted straight when mid-off or mid-on inched up.

There’s a technical side too. His downswing is compact, his head stays still at impact, and he trusts the top hand to guide lines. With the white Kookaburra not biting much at Chattogram, he reached his contact point consistently and kept his leg-side misses high enough to clear.

World Cup Spotlight: Fastest 200 in the ICC showpiece

The fastest ODI double century in the World Cup belongs to Glenn Maxwell: 200 in 128 balls at Wankhede, a chase that belongs more to folklore than to scorecards. Australia were wrecked early; Maxwell batted, cramped, crumpled, and then batted again as if pain were a tactical decoy. It wasn’t just power. It was elite decision-making under duress:

• He targeted back-of-length in the slot area even with restricted movement, using leverage from the hips and wrists.
• He refused the single when the non-striker was a tail-ender and took on the high-variance shot to protect the wicket count and maximize expected runs.
• He kept the ball mostly behind square when pace was on, then dragged spin into midwicket pockets with high bat speed through the arc.

That innings is unique for another reason: it’s the only ODI double century in a successful chase. Everyone else’s double hundred has come setting totals, with the safety net of overs remaining and wickets in hand. Maxwell did it racing the scoreboard with one functional leg and one real partner.

By Country: Fastest 200s in ODI (Matchups That Keep Repeating)

• India: The nation that industrialized ODI double hundreds. Fastest by balls is Ishan Kishan (126), followed by Virender Sehwag (140) and Shubman Gill (145). Then the Rohit Sharma trilogy—209, 208*, and 264—sits as a monument to opening-overs patience and end-overs pillage. Add Sachin Tendulkar’s 200* as the first male double hundred ever and the origin story for the modern template.
• Australia: Glenn Maxwell’s 201*, the World Cup miracle. It is also the fastest ODI 200 by an Australian, and the only one by the country to date.
• West Indies: Chris Gayle’s 215—thumps, thuds, and the staccato of a giant. He remains the only West Indian to breach 200 in ODIs.
• Pakistan: Fakhar Zaman’s 210* at Bulawayo, efficient and ruthless, with an opening batter’s classic tempo—solid base, risk measured, punish the fifth bowler.
• New Zealand: Martin Guptill’s 237* in a World Cup knockout, a truly high-stakes double hundred. His forward press against seam and natural loft over long-on and long-off were textbook Kiwi white-ball batting.
• Sri Lanka: Pathum Nissanka’s 210* at Pallekele, a pristine innings anchored in timing more than muscle. It signaled Sri Lanka’s transition into the double-hundred club after years of near-misses.
• South Africa, England, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe: No men’s ODI double centuries yet for SA or England, though both have teed up monster totals. Bangladesh have conceded a few, including the record-fastest via Kishan. Afghanistan have been victims of Maxwell’s miracle. Zimbabwe feature on the receiving end of two: Gayle and Fakhar.

By Venue and Conditions: Where ODI Doubles Keep Happening

Surfaces matter. Boundary sizes matter. Air density under lights matters. Certain venues keep turning up on this list because they deliver the trifecta of ODI run-friendliness: flat decks, high value for shots, and short or inviting square boundaries.

• Wankhede (Mumbai): Pace on, smallish square boundaries, and the ball flies at night. If you’re set, you can powerplay again from over 41.
• Eden Gardens (Kolkata): Big ground, but the pitch can be creamy; once a batter is in, timing multiplies. Rohit’s 264 felt inevitable after 35 overs.
• Indore: White-ball paradise, very fast outfield, and one of the most forgiving surfaces for high elbows and full faces.
• Hyderabad: Fresh ODI strip with true bounce and reliable carry—Shubman Gill’s game flows beautifully here.
• Wellington: In that knockout, it started a touch two-paced and then settled into a runway once Guptill locked in. The wind patterns are quirky, but he manipulated them expertly.
• Bulawayo: Historically generous batting conditions with limited sideways movement past the initial spell.
• Chattogram: Low spin-bite, relatively true bounce—good for bottom-hand heavy play through midwicket and square.
• Gwalior and Mohali: Classic Indian ODI batting strips where timing holds late into the innings.

Batting Position and the Shape of a Double Century

• Openers own the template. Most ODI double hundreds come from opening batters because they can bat the full 50, get two powerplays (the initial fielding restrictions and often a de facto late slog paradise), and pace their risk strategically. They also get the most balls to work with.
• Maxwell at No. 6 is the rogue outlier. It’s prohibitively difficult to do from the middle order because you have fewer balls to begin with, and you’re often responding to match pressure rather than setting it. Maxwell’s innings rewrites what’s thinkable from No. 6.
• The middle-overs test: Even for openers, the stretch from overs 21–40 breaks most double-century attempts. It’s where you meet two primary spinners, the opposition tries to choke singles, and fielders patrol the pockets. The best ODI double hundreds show a second wind right after the 35th over, where the set batter reclaims tempo.

First Innings vs. Chases: Why Maxwell Stands Alone

Every other ODI double hundred on the men’s side came while setting a target. Here you can afford a phase of consolidation, then unleash with wickets in hand. In a chase, mistakes magnify. Risk carries not just the price of a wicket but also the wreckage of the pursuit. Maxwell’s 201* is therefore an extreme statistical and tactical outlier: a double hundred in a chase, made after a collapse, with limited mobility, against bowlers sensing blood. It’s the one innings on this list where “fastest 200 balls in ODI” intersects with absolute match value in a way none of the others had to confront.

Context Explainers: What Made the Top Five Special

1) Ishan Kishan — the record itself

Beyond the headline number (200 in 126 balls), Kishan’s genius was tempo control without friction. He didn’t get stuck on strike-rotation puzzles. His scoring zones were broad: square of the wicket on both sides, then deep midwicket when spinners pulled length back. The risk audit was sound: most big swings were in arc, and he rarely sliced across the line early. It felt like a T20 opening burst that simply never ended.

2) Glenn Maxwell — pain tolerance and control under crisis

That Wankhede knock should be impossible. He essentially batted one-legged for the back half, and yet his shot selection was as logical as it was spectacular. He took high-value options—length he could pick up even with restricted footwork—and refused greed when it meant exposing the tail. The distribution was modern: fewer classical drives, more baseball-like bat-paths through midwicket and over square leg, and the occasional disdainful loft into the sightscreen.

3) Chris Gayle — a long-ball masterclass

The scoreboard says 10 fours and 16 sixes. That line alone explains the geometry: he trusted his reach and power to convert good length into launching pads. The myth is that Gayle only muscles. The truth is that he watches length longer than most, then commits to a hitting zone with terrifying certainty. Once settled, he lifted full and good length with the same ease as short balls.

4) Virender Sehwag — bat-swing purity

Sehwag’s 219 had that trademark economy of movement. Minimal footwork, maximal head stability, and a bat swing that is poetry for coaches who preach stillness at impact. Against spin, he was irreverent—either forcing length back with a stride or going so deep that the same ball became a half-volley. One of the cleanest examples of an opener turning an ODI into a personal net session.

5) Shubman Gill — elegance accelerated

Gill’s double hundred is important because it shows a path to 200 that’s not entirely built on brute force. Plenty of his boundaries were carves and deflections, and his vertical bat remained in play deep into the innings. He didn’t need to premeditate much; he trusted the surface and his timing to punch gaps. Once past 150, he allowed himself to graduate to the aerial routes.

Strike-Rate Stories: Not All 200s Feel the Same

• Power-density vs. volume: Gayle’s 215 felt like a home-run derby. Maxwell’s 201* was a calculated raid in tough conditions. Kishan’s 210 had the velocity of a T20 innings elongated over 50 overs. Sehwag’s 219 was a clinic in flow-state batting: balls became lines, lines became margins, and margins became illusions.
• Boundary architecture: Note the fours-to-sixes trade-offs. Rohit Sharma’s 264 (33 fours, 9 sixes) stands out as a fours-based mountain, built on surgical placement and late-over carnage. Compare that to Rohit’s 209, where 16 sixes did most of the violence. Different innings, different paths, one legend.

Venues, Opposition, and Conditions: Patterns You Can Use

• Square boundaries and altitude: Stadia with shorter square dimensions amplify win margins for batters with strong sweeps and pulls. In modern ODIs, teams bowl harder into the wicket through the middle overs; if the square is short, that plan can backfire spectacularly.
• Second innings dew: Some iconic doubles came under lights in scoring heavens. But dew adds a second-innings wrinkle—the ball slips, the grip disappears, and the yorker becomes risky. Batsmen with the temperament to play late and straight are rewarded.
• Oppositions in flux: Several double hundreds landed on days where the fifth bowler was undercooked, or the main spinner missed his lengths. Batters sense when a side has only 38–40 legitimate overs and feast on the rest. The best double hundreds are ruthless about this.

Women’s ODIs: Double Centuries and the Pace Question

Women’s ODI cricket has its own double-century royalty:

• Belinda Clark’s 229* for Australia kicked down the door. It was an innings of positional hitting and timing, long before the power era took hold.
• Amelia Kerr’s 232* for New Zealand, crafted as a teenager, reimagined what composure looks like in ODIs. She turned singles into twos with speed, then went aerial whenever fields squeezed. By modern metrics, her tempo would sit high on any “fastest 200 in ODI” conversation when measured by strike rate and control.

While “fastest by balls” data is not always uniformly reported across every women’s ODI double, what’s undeniable is the trendline: professionalization, better batting depth, stronger domestic ecosystems, and white-ball skill transfer from T20 leagues have raised the ceiling. Expect the women’s list to grow—and to grow faster.

Comparisons That Add Clarity

• Fastest 200 vs. Highest Score: Rohit Sharma’s 264 remains the highest ODI score. It is not the fastest to 200 by balls. Different records, different stories. Highest score rewards endurance and conversion; fastest to 200 rewards velocity and risk calculus.
• Fastest 200 vs. Fastest 150: AB de Villiers owns the fastest 150 marks in ODIs, but if you’re hunting for double hundreds, the pattern is different—openers and upper-order players set the table, then devour the last 10–12 overs. The fastest 150 doesn’t always transition to 200 because of wickets lost, strike change, or game context.
• In-chase 200s: A list of one—Maxwell. That adds a layer of reverence to his place in the “fastest 200 in ODI” discussion.

Tactical Anatomy of a Double Hundred

A double hundred is never an accident. Breaking down the craft:

• Phase 1 (0–50 balls): Reduce dots. Bank your powerplay. Get your stable scoring zones early—either behind point or in front of square. If seamers miss full, cash in straight.
• Phase 2 (51–110 balls): The middle-overs exam. Get your single pattern fluent: soft hands into either side of the wicket, the occasional advance to play with length, and the sweep repertoire. Don’t let a three-over spin squeeze lead to a rash shot. If you can hold 6–7 an over here without drama, you’re on the tracks.
• Phase 3 (111–150 balls): Second wind. The opposition returns to pace, fields spread, and the ball is older. This is when you flip to aerial options with intent. Pick your matchup—the fifth bowler or the tired pacer—and build a burst through overs 41–45.
• Phase 4 (151+ balls): Finish with clarity. Know your range. If long-on is wide, go straighter; if midwicket is deep, use the square. Protect the partner if needed. Every extra over you survive, the bowler’s margin shrinks.

What Elite Batters Do Differently

• Under-hit management: The greats pick trajectories that clear the ring even on a mishit. They know their miss patterns. Hitting “percentages” isn’t jargon; it’s the difference between 170 and 210.
• Strike farming without ego: Look at Maxwell’s refusal of singles with the tail. Look at Rohit’s calculated singles early to avoid overcooking risk. Look at Gill’s late switch to lofted drives only when third man and fine leg were manipulated. This is control, not conservatism.
• Conditioning and cramp planning: Mid to late innings cramp is real. Hydration, salt balance, and pre-mapped recovery windows between overs matter. Teams have plans. The best players have personal hacks.

Grounds That Have Hosted ODI Double Centuries

• Chattogram (ZACS)
• Wankhede (Mumbai)
• Manuka Oval (Canberra)
• Indore
• Hyderabad
• Bulawayo
• Eden Gardens (Kolkata)
• Bengaluru (M Chinnaswamy)
• Mohali (IS Bindra)
• Wellington (Basin Reserve)
• Gwalior
• Pallekele

Expect more to join as teams chase par scores north of 330 on flat strips and squads deepen their hitting to No. 8.

Fastest ODI Double Centuries in World Cups

• Glenn Maxwell, 201* at Wankhede — fastest by balls in a World Cup, the only chase-200.
• Chris Gayle, 215 at Manuka Oval — sixes everywhere, a statement of force.
• Martin Guptill, 237* at Wellington — the biggest in a World Cup knockout and one of the coldest displays of shot control at scale.

India’s ODI 200 Club: A Quick Sense of Pace

• Ishan Kishan — the fastest (126 balls to 200), an explosion from ball one.
• Virender Sehwag — rhythm over muscle, 200 in 140 balls.
• Shubman Gill — elegance on rails, 200 in 145 balls.
• Rohit Sharma — three members-only epics; 209 and 208* sit around 151 balls to 200; the 264 was a four-hitting odyssey.
• Sachin Tendulkar — the first of them all for men’s ODIs, a blueprint many followed.

Pakistan, New Zealand, West Indies, Sri Lanka: Solo Signatures

• Pakistan: Fakhar Zaman’s 210*—fast hands, relentless on anything wide, and hungry in the last 10 overs.
• New Zealand: Martin Guptill’s 237*—clinically dismantled a knockout attack.
• West Indies: Chris Gayle’s 215—when Gayle senses a length, there’s no plan B.
• Sri Lanka: Pathum Nissanka’s 210*—a tempo lesson; risk under control, gaps found repeatedly, and compact finishing power.

Data Footnotes and Integrity

Across different scorecards and broadcasters, small discrepancies can exist around the exact ball on which 200 was reached, especially for some older broadcasts or newer additions that were updated post-match. The headline entries you see here are grounded in widely corroborated scorecard data: Kishan at 126, Maxwell at 128, Gayle at 138, Sehwag at 140, Gill at 145, Fakhar at 148, Rohit’s 209 and 264 around 151, Guptill at 152, Tendulkar at 147 to the landmark. For Pathum Nissanka’s 210*, while the completed-innings numbers are clear and his inclusion in the fastest-by-tempo group is undeniable, ball-exact milestone figures are still variably reported across some public datasets; the innings nevertheless ranks among the quickest modern doubles and stands as Sri Lanka’s standard-bearer.

People Also Ask: Quick, Clear Answers

– Who has the fastest 200 in ODI?
Ishan Kishan. He reached 200 in 126 balls against Bangladesh at Chattogram.

– How many balls did Ishan Kishan take to score 200 in ODI?
He took 126 balls to get to 200, the quickest ODI double century by balls.

– How many double centuries are there in ODI cricket?
On the men’s side, there are a dozen distinct double hundreds logged by a select group of batters. Women’s ODIs have two landmark doubles, including the first-ever ODI 200 and a modern 230-plus masterclass. Combined, that puts the total in the mid-teens and growing steadily.

– Who scored the first 200 in ODI?
Sachin Tendulkar scored the first double century in men’s ODIs, an unbeaten 200 at Gwalior. In women’s ODIs, Belinda Clark’s 229* was the trailblazer.

– Who has the most double centuries in ODI?
Rohit Sharma, with three.

– Which is the fastest 200 in ODI World Cup?
Glenn Maxwell’s 200 in 128 balls at Wankhede, and it came in a successful chase.

– Which grounds have seen ODI double centuries?
Chattogram, Wankhede, Manuka Oval, Indore, Hyderabad, Bulawayo, Eden Gardens, Bengaluru, Mohali, Wellington, Gwalior, and Pallekele are on the list.

– Who is the youngest to score an ODI double century?
Ishan Kishan is the youngest male batter to do it.

– What is the highest individual score in ODI?
Rohit Sharma’s 264 at Eden Gardens is the highest ODI score recorded.

Fastest 200 in ODI: Patterns You Can Bet On

• Most happen from the top. Opening batters have the best shot volume and the best look at both new balls.
• The innings lives or dies in overs 21–40. That’s where modern greats keep the board ticking while silently setting up the last-10 assault.
• Sixes vs. fours: There isn’t a single model. Rohit’s 264 was a fours blizzard; Gayle’s 215 was a sixes hailstorm; Gill’s 208 was about angles and glide before the aerial switch.
• The chase tax is real. Only one man has paid it and still got past 200—Maxwell.

A Short Note in Hindi for India’s Cricket Searchers

ODI mein sabse tez dohra shatak: Ishan Kishan ne 200 sirf 126 ball mein banaye, Bangladesh ke khilaaf, Chattogram mein. Yeh ab tak ka sabse tez ODI 200 hai.

Editorial View: The Record Will Fall—But Not the Way You Think

Purely by batting evolution, training, and the white-ball ecosystem, another sub-130-ball ODI 200 is inevitable. But don’t be shocked if it comes from an opener who’s already scored 80 by the 15th over and is batting with a set partner into the 35th. The conditions that make it likely:

• A true pitch with even bounce and minimal grip for spin
• A fifth bowler worth targeting
• A small square
• Dew assisting at night (if chasing) or a slick outfield under lights (if batting first and finishing late)

What won’t be easy to replicate is Maxwell’s version: a double hundred in a knife-fight chase. If that ever gets beaten for pace, it will be by an innings that also bends cricketing logic.

Closing Thoughts: Why We Keep Watching

The “fastest 200 in ODI” isn’t just a number—it’s the story of a batter’s day when risk and reward high-fived for three hours straight. When you reach a 200 in under 130 balls, you aren’t just ahead of the rate; you’re bending it to your will. You’re reading length earlier, choosing smarter shots, and carrying your team through overs that usually chew up attempts. That’s why these knocks live forever. They’re not just run mountains; they’re clarity in motion.

Bookmark this page. When the next rocket lands—a sub-125, maybe even a sub-120—this list will move. Until then, the crown sits with Ishan Kishan at 126 balls to 200, Maxwell owns the World Cup and the only chase-double, and the rest of the pantheon—Rohit, Gayle, Guptill, Sehwag, Gill, Fakhar, Tendulkar, and Nissanka—each carved a different way to the same impossible summit.

Appendix: Quick Reference – ODI Double 200s and Notable Details

• Ishan Kishan — 210 vs Bangladesh, Chattogram — fastest to 200 (126 balls)
• Glenn Maxwell — 201* vs Afghanistan, Wankhede — fastest World Cup 200 (128 balls), only chase-double
• Chris Gayle — 215 vs Zimbabwe, Manuka Oval — 200 in 138 balls, 16 sixes
• Virender Sehwag — 219 vs West Indies, Indore — 200 in 140 balls, bat-swing masterclass
• Shubman Gill — 208 vs New Zealand, Hyderabad — 200 in 145 balls, elegance and gears
• Fakhar Zaman — 210* vs Zimbabwe, Bulawayo — 200 in 148 balls, opening dominance
• Rohit Sharma — 209 vs Australia, Bengaluru — 200 in 151 balls, 16 sixes
• Rohit Sharma — 208* vs Sri Lanka, Mohali — around 151 balls to 200, calculated acceleration
• Rohit Sharma — 264 vs Sri Lanka, Eden Gardens — highest ODI score, 33 fours
• Martin Guptill — 237* vs West Indies, Wellington — 200 in 152 balls, World Cup knockout masterclass
• Sachin Tendulkar — 200* vs South Africa, Gwalior — first men’s ODI double hundred
• Pathum Nissanka — 210* vs Afghanistan, Pallekele — Sri Lanka’s first ODI double hundred, elite modern tempo
• Belinda Clark (Women’s ODI) — 229* for Australia — first ODI double century
• Amelia Kerr (Women’s ODI) — 232* for New Zealand — modern landmark at extraordinary composure and pace

For analysts, coaches, and the diehards: keep an eye on surfaces like Indore, Hyderabad, Wankhede, and Kolkata; on openers who can rotate through spin without reducing boundary frequency; and on teams whose fifth-bowler plan has cracks. That’s where the next fastest 200 in ODI will come from.